• Accueil
  • Science
  • Paano naglaakbay ang enerhiya mua sa araw papuntan...

Paano naglaakbay ang enerhiya mua sa araw papuntang mundo?
a. gravity
b. radiation
c. magnet
d. waves​

Answers

  • Réponse publiée par: Grakname
    False. essential fatty acids are unsaturated, which means that they contain one or more double bonds.
  • Réponse publiée par: kenn14

    answer:

    science, technologies, and the human condition. the center for the humanities' year-long series — science, technologies, and the human condition — explores the ways technologies have transformed how we perceive the body, time, space, and our environment.

    explanation:

    society applauds the recent advancements of scientific technology

    in fields such as medicine, energy, and communication. while

    humankind profits in many ways from this technology, a few

    voices are heard cautioning society to consider the implications of

    these developments. this paper discusses the gulf which appears

    to exist between scientific technology and the human condition.

    reasons for this gulf are: i ) the failure to develop a philosophy

    of science in which human values, and aspirations are viewed

    within the context of scientific technology, 2) the reductionist

    approach to science in which the parts are emphasized at the

    expense of the whole; and, 3) the failure to conceptualize

    behavior in such a way that the situational or contextual

    variables of technology are understood. the paper concludes by

    proposing a social ecological model of human behavior which

    allows for the integration of technology with the human condition.

    i ntroduct ion

    society applauds the advancement scientific technology has made in

    recent years in various fields, such as medicine, energy, and

    communication. while humankind profits in many ways from this

    technology, a few voices are heard cautioning society to consider the

    implications of these developments.

    the objective of this paper is not a crusade for clean air, a lament for

    the return to the "good old days," or a call to halt the advancement of

    scientific technology. rather, the purpose is to discuss the interface of

    scientific technology and the human condition. most important is that e

    gulf currently exists between these two factors. several factors are

    responsible for this gulf: 1) the failure to develop a philosophy o

    science in which the human condition, values, goals, and aspirations ar

    viewed within the context of scientific technology; 2) the reductionis

    approach to science in which the parts are emphasized at the expense of

    the gestalt or whole; and, 3) the failure to conceptualize behavior in such

    a way that the situational or contextual variables of technology are

    understood. the paper will conclude by proposing a social ecological

    model of human behavior, which allows for the integration of technology

    and the human condition at both the mirco-level of individual

    psycho-social functioning and at the macro-level of social institution.

    rhe need for a philosophy of science

    rene dubos (1965), in the essay "science and man's nature"

    published in da lus, reports on a symposium entitled "man and his

    future" held in london in 1963. the purpose of the conference was to

    study and predict the effects of science on every aspect of human life.

    dubos observed that the participants had no difficulty discussing the role

    of science in terms of space exploration, energy, and the consumption of

    raw materials. as a matter of fact, the participants seemed to believe that

    there were few limitations to what science might do. however, dubos

    noticed that no-one seemed to be able to deal adequately with the human

    side of the coin, or the psychological, ethical, emotional, and cultural

    factors which mediate the use of science. dubos felt this was an indication

    that scientific knowledge was in danger of becoming alienated from human

    experience, thus reducing the ability of technology to meet human needs.

    dubos refers to this as the disjunction between technology and human

    experience. the choice of the word "disjunction" is rather interesting.

    one might visualize this phenomenon as similar to putting an electrical

    plug incorrectly into an extension cord socket. this results in one prong

    in one hole and the other sticking out of the socket. to lament over the

    disjunction of science and technology is not a cry for a return to the good

    old days in which life was supposedly was simpler and sounder, a thesis

    which could easily be refuted. rather, dubos is asserting that there is a

    need for a new philosophy of science, one which will unite scientific

    technology with human experience (mokrzychi, 1983; munevar, 1981 ).

    one cannot assume that automatically the good life will emerge from

    scientific and technological inventions, and naively think that more of the

    latter will create a better society.

    the disjunction between scientific technology and human experience

    is being demonstrated in some of the questions facing modern society. one

    example of the double-edged nature of technology is the development of

Connaissez-vous la bonne réponse?
Paano naglaakbay ang enerhiya mua sa araw papuntang mundo? a. gravityb. radiationc. magnetd. waves​...